the other side knows about burden and infringement. for guns, they hate them so much, they ignore law and common sense. as stated in the article by one of those interviewed, this jeopardizes the legitimacy of SCOTUS. if only this were a single case when that has happened!
Thomas had this dissent on todays abortion ruling. and it will be completely ignored
Thomas had this dissent on todays abortion ruling. and it will be completely ignored
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote: The Court has simultaneously transformed judicially created rights like the right to abortion into preferred constitutional rights, while disfavoring many of the rights actually enumerated in the Constitution," Thomas wrote. "But our Constitution renounces the notion that some constitutional rights are more equal than others. ... A law either infringes a constitutional right, or not; there is no room for the judiciary to invent tolerable degrees of encroachment. Unless the Court abides by one set of rules to adjudicate constitutional rights, it will continue reducing constitutional law to policy-driven value judgments until the last shreds of its legitimacy disappear.http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/27/politics/ ... ion-texas/
Last edited by pick_six on Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
