Login    
   
   
    Register FAQ  •  Search    

· Home ·   Forums ·  Who Are We? ·  What is Open Carry? ·  CCDW Process ·  FAQ ·  Contact ·  Terms ·

Fundraiser to Support Delaware Open Carry!


We've come to that time of the year when our server lease and domain name registrations are coming up for renewal. In the past, many of you have expressed your generosity in the form of donations in order to keep the site running - I'm asking for your support again this year.

Please visit our donation information page for more details and, if you enjoy this site, if you've ever attended our gatherings or, if this community has brought you some knowledge or entertainment, please give what you can to keep us going.

→ Donation Information Page ←


It is currently Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:42 pm
Posts: 8
Location: venus
I understand what you are trying to say and this was not my personal experience.
I NEVER SAID IT WAS, just justifying what PJD832 said and because I know him too
In person , and I know the facts from him in person :lol:


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:24 am
Posts: 539
Judge says Cabela’s not at fault here

https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/arti ... n-lawsuit/


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:49 am
Posts: 610
Location: NOT Bear - Christiana Area
Goody! I can't wait for the mainstream media to pick this up, expound on this for us and tell us all the background here with the full decision. <holding breath now!>

_________________
"The purpose of the pistol is to stop a fight that somebody else has started, almost always at very short range." -- Jeff Cooper

Image


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:24 am
Posts: 539
hmmm apparently, the dismissal occurred back in march. just hitting some publicity now.

https://delawareliberal.net/2019/03/30/ ... r-lawsuit/

even the locals covered it then.

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/ne ... 317660002/

either way, a good win. hope cabelas/bass pro has their legal costs paid back.


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:49 am
Posts: 610
Location: NOT Bear - Christiana Area
The News Urinal story aside... See????

_________________
"The purpose of the pistol is to stop a fight that somebody else has started, almost always at very short range." -- Jeff Cooper

Image


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:49 am
Posts: 118
In case anyone is interested in reading Judge Medinilla's decision, here's a link.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/indeco20190329089


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 6:12 am
Posts: 3
Thanks for the link to the judge's decision, that'll help us gun owners for when the next big lawsuit comes...


 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: Cabelas law suit
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:49 am
Posts: 118
The Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the decision in favor of Cabelas, in a summary order that just says "the Superior Court got it right."

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Do ... ?id=298360

The case was heard en banc, by all five members of the Court, and all agreed in the outcome. Justices Valihura, Vaughn and Traynor were on our side in the state parks case. Chief Justice Seitz joined the dissent in that case. The other member of the en banc panel was Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock, sitting by designation; I believe that's because there was a vacancy on the Supreme Court at the time the case was heard.


 Profile  


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


phpBB skin developed by: John Olson
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group