Page 3 of 3

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:29 pm
by GLOCKGIRL
I understand what you are trying to say and this was not my personal experience.
I NEVER SAID IT WAS, just justifying what PJD832 said and because I know him too
In person , and I know the facts from him in person :lol:

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:03 am
by pick_six
Judge says Cabela’s not at fault here

https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/arti ... n-lawsuit/

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:08 pm
by NCC
Goody! I can't wait for the mainstream media to pick this up, expound on this for us and tell us all the background here with the full decision. <holding breath now!>

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:53 pm
by pick_six
hmmm apparently, the dismissal occurred back in march. just hitting some publicity now.

https://delawareliberal.net/2019/03/30/ ... r-lawsuit/

even the locals covered it then.

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/ne ... 317660002/

either way, a good win. hope cabelas/bass pro has their legal costs paid back.

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:35 pm
by NCC
The News Urinal story aside... See????

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:58 pm
by California_Exile
In case anyone is interested in reading Judge Medinilla's decision, here's a link.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/indeco20190329089

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:39 am
by Flanker_27
Thanks for the link to the judge's decision, that'll help us gun owners for when the next big lawsuit comes...

Re: Cabelas law suit

PostPosted:Wed Dec 04, 2019 1:15 pm
by California_Exile
The Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the decision in favor of Cabelas, in a summary order that just says "the Superior Court got it right."

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Do ... ?id=298360

The case was heard en banc, by all five members of the Court, and all agreed in the outcome. Justices Valihura, Vaughn and Traynor were on our side in the state parks case. Chief Justice Seitz joined the dissent in that case. The other member of the en banc panel was Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock, sitting by designation; I believe that's because there was a vacancy on the Supreme Court at the time the case was heard.