Page 1 of 2

Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:41 pm
by SeanM
OK, so it's only a TEMPORARY thing, but I just about fell off my chair.

Seriously folks, remember... it was just a mistake....

http://www.delawareonline.com/article/2 ... -withdrawn
Marshall, a Wilmington Democrat, said an "error by staff" resulted in the wrong draft being filed. He said there was miscommunication between Attorney General Beau Biden's office and his office in the Senate. Biden and his staff were leading the effort on on the assault weapons ban. "I thought I had the Attorney General's draft," Marshall said.
:oops:

Sean

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:57 pm
by DelmarDave
Ohh yeah. I know they will try something else but its a start. I really hate the thought that my kids would have known me as a criminal because there was no way in hell I would have followed this law.

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:46 am
by Mr.Skellington
That is what I call formally tipping your hand. The name of the game is incrementalism, the end game is Feinstein's vision of total disarmament of the citizens. The masses aren't yet conditioned enough for registration, not today, maybe next time. It's in the playbook though.

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:33 am
by stephpd
Darn!!!!!

For some reason my comment got yanked from TNJ.
And I have no idea why since I didn't denigrate anyone but the AG's office for not having a very high conviction rate. Even provided the link to the latest FOIA request showing how poor a job the state is doing.

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:22 am
by Boots
stephpd wrote:Darn!!!!!

For some reason my comment got yanked from TNJ.
And I have no idea why since I didn't denigrate anyone but the AG's office for not having a very high conviction rate. Even provided the link to the latest FOIA request showing how poor a job the state is doing.
Apparently, you're not following the party line!

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:26 am
by SeanM
Boots wrote:Apparently, you're not following the party line!
:pointlaugh: What he said....

Sean

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:39 am
by Amy Blackthorn
stephpd wrote:Darn!!!!!

For some reason my comment got yanked from TNJ.
And I have no idea why since I didn't denigrate anyone but the AG's office for not having a very high conviction rate. Even provided the link to the latest FOIA request showing how poor a job the state is doing.
Can you post those stats here?

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:50 am
by John_P
What really irks me (and I've written my State Rep. about it) is the AG and Governor's offices writing legislation and then looking for some one to sponsor it. I thought that our system was to have the legislators only introduce those bills that reflected the will of the people, not the other way around.

Guess I was confused. :?

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:41 pm
by SeanM
Amy Blackthorn wrote:
stephpd wrote:Darn!!!!!

For some reason my comment got yanked from TNJ.
And I have no idea why since I didn't denigrate anyone but the AG's office for not having a very high conviction rate. Even provided the link to the latest FOIA request showing how poor a job the state is doing.
Can you post those stats here?
Take a look here...

http://fsffa.org/we-dont-need-more-gun- ... rent-laws/

A link to the original PDF is on that page as well.

Sean

Re: Assault Weapons Ban - Stricken

PostPosted:Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:50 pm
by Amy Blackthorn
Thanks